newfoundland
08-24 06:51 AM
Hi,
I am from Buffalo, i would like to come .. i am not sure yet.
how many are coming from buffalo?
________----
EB2-NIW
PD - March 2003
i485 RD - august 2003
CSC to NSC - March, 2007
waiting for GC
I am from Buffalo, i would like to come .. i am not sure yet.
how many are coming from buffalo?
________----
EB2-NIW
PD - March 2003
i485 RD - august 2003
CSC to NSC - March, 2007
waiting for GC
wallpaper free coloring pages
Reggit
10-13 12:44 AM
Anyway that I can get a solid black line? It keeps preserving the opacity deficient coloring of the actual rectangle. More or less, the black line is getting the same 50% opacity as I made the rectangle. Don't want that. :P
:pirate: Ar.
:pirate: Ar.
Blog Feeds
07-09 12:30 PM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
Senator Sessions cannot leave his hands off of E-Verify. Now in "stealth" mode, Senator Sessions has slyly introduced an E-Verify amendment (SB 1371) during today's full Senate vote on the DHS appropriations bill.
The Sessions amendment calls for a permanent reauthorization of the Basic Pilot/E-Verify program, and mandates its use for all federal contractors and subcontractors - including the verification of all existing employees. This amounts to a massive expansion of a program that is still not ready for prime-time.
We must call our Senators and tell them to oppose this sneak attack by Senator Sessions for the following reasons:
It would impose exorbitant costs on businesses at a time when our economy is most vulnerable:
An economic analysis commissioned by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
concluded that the net societal costs of the program would be $10 billion a year
� a cost that would be felt disproportionately by small businesses. It would make Basic Pilot/E-Verify permanent without addressing its well documented database inaccuracies:
A 2007 independent evaluation of the program commissioned by DHS found that
the Basic Pilot/E-Verify database �is still not sufficiently up to date� to meet
the requirements for �accurate verification.�
SSA has estimated that if Basic Pilot/E-Verify were to become mandatory and
the databases were not improved, SSA database errors alone could result in 3.6
million workers a year being misidentified as not authorized for employment.
This would result in 6 out of every 100 workers having to visit an SSA office to
correct their records or lose their job.
It would force workers and businesses to pay a high price for Basic Pilot/E-Verify's inaccuracies:
Queries submitted to Basic Pilot/E-Verify by Intel Corporation in 2008 resulted
in nearly 13 percent of all workers being initially flagged as unauthorized for
employment. All of these workers were cleared by Basic Pilot/E-Verify as
work-authorized, but only after �significant investment of time and money�
and �lost productivity.�We urge all AILA members to call their Congressman today and oppose the Sessions amendment (SB 1371). Don't let Senator Session's stealth tactics create a nationwide crisis for employers!
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-5839069238864574507?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/07/there-he-goes-again-sessions-and-e.html)
2011 printable each coloring page
Blog Feeds
11-08 03:30 PM
So is the economic downturn over already, if you look at the recent H1B filings it may well be the case. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has updated its periodic count of FY2010 H-1B cap (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html) filings, revealing that there has been a significant increase in the rate of filings during the month of October 2009. USCIS has stated that it has received a sufficient number of petitions to use all of the available 20,000 H-1B numbers that are reserved for individuals with advanced degrees from U.S. colleges or universities, which means that the "advanced degree" H-1B cap for FY2010 has been reached. H-1Bs for individuals with advanced degrees from U.S. colleges or universities can still be filed, but those petitions will now count toward the general H-1B cap of 65,000.
Around 6,200 cap-subject H-1B (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html) petitions were filed in October 2009. This is a significant number, especially when compared to the only 1,500 filings received by USCIS in September 2009. In total, as of October 25, 2009, approximately 52,800 H-1B petitions that count against the congressionally-mandated 65,000 limit have been received by USCIS. This leaves only around 12,000 H-1B cap numbers for FY2010, without taking into account the 6,800 H-1B cap numbers that are reserved for nationals of Chile and Singapore. If all 6,800 of these "reserved" numbers are removed from the 65,000 cap along with the 52,800 H-1B cap petitions already received, there are only around 5,400 FY2010 H-1B cap numbers remaining.
As a practical matter, USCIS will likely accept well more than 5,400 additional cap cases in FY2010, as the number of cases USCIS will accept anticipates that a certain number of filings will be withdrawn or denied. Additionally, nowhere near the full 6,800 Chile/Singapore numbers have historically been actually used by nationals of Chile or Singapore. Thus, most of those numbers are applied by USCIS to the general 65,000 cap.
While USCIS is still accepting H-1B petitions for FY 2010, the recent jump in filing means that by mid December or so we will have no Visas left. My advice go ahead and file now.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/11/h1b_visa_lawyer_advanced_degre_1.html)
Around 6,200 cap-subject H-1B (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html) petitions were filed in October 2009. This is a significant number, especially when compared to the only 1,500 filings received by USCIS in September 2009. In total, as of October 25, 2009, approximately 52,800 H-1B petitions that count against the congressionally-mandated 65,000 limit have been received by USCIS. This leaves only around 12,000 H-1B cap numbers for FY2010, without taking into account the 6,800 H-1B cap numbers that are reserved for nationals of Chile and Singapore. If all 6,800 of these "reserved" numbers are removed from the 65,000 cap along with the 52,800 H-1B cap petitions already received, there are only around 5,400 FY2010 H-1B cap numbers remaining.
As a practical matter, USCIS will likely accept well more than 5,400 additional cap cases in FY2010, as the number of cases USCIS will accept anticipates that a certain number of filings will be withdrawn or denied. Additionally, nowhere near the full 6,800 Chile/Singapore numbers have historically been actually used by nationals of Chile or Singapore. Thus, most of those numbers are applied by USCIS to the general 65,000 cap.
While USCIS is still accepting H-1B petitions for FY 2010, the recent jump in filing means that by mid December or so we will have no Visas left. My advice go ahead and file now.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/11/h1b_visa_lawyer_advanced_degre_1.html)
more...
hebron
12-08 01:42 AM
My wife and I are scheduled to go for fingerprinting this month. We have a year old son and obviously we are planning to take him with us as well. Do I need to take any form of ID / birth certificate of my son (obviously he is not to be fingerprinted) but not sure what the rules are with respect to carrying infants for the interview. Anyone who has fingerprinted in a similar situation?
We took our 17 month old daughter with us. You should not have a problem with that.
BTW, The only problem we had was that our daughter was scared of the tough looking security guy and she started crying as soon as she saw him and we had a hard time consoling her :)
We took our 17 month old daughter with us. You should not have a problem with that.
BTW, The only problem we had was that our daughter was scared of the tough looking security guy and she started crying as soon as she saw him and we had a hard time consoling her :)
newtoh1
03-23 06:37 PM
I am planning to go India.Can I leave at JFK Newyork airport and return back at chicago POE?Will it be alright?
I heard that there are some client verification letters are asking at POE these days?anybody really faced such situation?If yes, what exactly we have to provide?
I am just scaring by the time I return back, I will have only 2 months of valid H1B visa.Will be it alright?
I heard that there are some client verification letters are asking at POE these days?anybody really faced such situation?If yes, what exactly we have to provide?
I am just scaring by the time I return back, I will have only 2 months of valid H1B visa.Will be it alright?
more...
bank_king2003
04-23 06:32 PM
I have an h1b and EAD. i am employee of company A. currently i am working for a client(a startup company) in project through company A.. now this client wants to give me some equity(shares) of his company. i will keep on working as company A's consultant with this client.
my question is can i take the equity(shares) of my client. ofcourse he is not paying me anything, my paycheck still comes from company A as i am there h1b employee.
just wanted to make sure taking equity wont hurt my h1b ??
Any Advice ??
Thanks...
my question is can i take the equity(shares) of my client. ofcourse he is not paying me anything, my paycheck still comes from company A as i am there h1b employee.
just wanted to make sure taking equity wont hurt my h1b ??
Any Advice ??
Thanks...
2010 coloring pages beach
gc_on_demand
08-13 03:39 PM
Its really a good idea.
But you need little more home work as listed below.
(1) Update your profile first.
(2) Book an appointment with your lawmaker to discuss this idea.
Let me know if you want me or other to join in your meeting. If you are living in my state I will join you.
To me you are a perfect leader to lead this initiative....
Hows that ?
But you need little more home work as listed below.
(1) Update your profile first.
(2) Book an appointment with your lawmaker to discuss this idea.
Let me know if you want me or other to join in your meeting. If you are living in my state I will join you.
To me you are a perfect leader to lead this initiative....
Hows that ?
more...
ssharma
06-30 05:06 PM
Here is a memo from one of the law firms, I found on the net.
http://www.michaelpiston.net/documents/m/changing%20employer%20after%20I-485%20is%20approved.pdf
After digging thro' forums it seems everyone talks about having the "intention" of staying with the Employer after GC.
Here's my question.
- Should the "intention" be on the day of filing 485 or the day you get GC ? (a date in future that no one can predict).
If the "intention" has to be at the time of 485 filing then, after 180 days of filing 485 one should be able to change employers, irrespective of the case being approved or NOT.
thoughts/comments ??
http://www.michaelpiston.net/documents/m/changing%20employer%20after%20I-485%20is%20approved.pdf
After digging thro' forums it seems everyone talks about having the "intention" of staying with the Employer after GC.
Here's my question.
- Should the "intention" be on the day of filing 485 or the day you get GC ? (a date in future that no one can predict).
If the "intention" has to be at the time of 485 filing then, after 180 days of filing 485 one should be able to change employers, irrespective of the case being approved or NOT.
thoughts/comments ??
hair starfish coloring pages
ssdtm
11-20 01:06 PM
>>>>>>2 H1 is possible as long as the hours you propose are within justification.
Is the hour in each important or the minimum wage. I believe it is the mimimum wage that counts.
>>>>>>>Likewise applying for greencard from 2 places of your work may get you an RFE asking for your true intention to work full time for a employer
The greencard is only from the first H1. In fact I have already filed I-485 on basis of my employment with this co.
Is the hour in each important or the minimum wage. I believe it is the mimimum wage that counts.
>>>>>>>Likewise applying for greencard from 2 places of your work may get you an RFE asking for your true intention to work full time for a employer
The greencard is only from the first H1. In fact I have already filed I-485 on basis of my employment with this co.
more...
jamesingham
05-29 10:16 AM
As far as I know, nothing that is being considered in the Senate is going to relieve the Green Card backlog.
They have plans to eliminate the backlog in 5 to 8 years not immediately. So if one chooses not to re-apply under the new point based system, waiting time doesnt change much for him. (It may be become worse because they are cutting down immigrant visas in EB category from 130k to 90k)
But if one decides to re-apply under the new point based system, things may become faster.
I am hoping that under the new system, they will give some priority to people who already waited for a significant amount of time under the old system.
This is just my analysis based on the articles I read on the internet and the bill text itself.
They have plans to eliminate the backlog in 5 to 8 years not immediately. So if one chooses not to re-apply under the new point based system, waiting time doesnt change much for him. (It may be become worse because they are cutting down immigrant visas in EB category from 130k to 90k)
But if one decides to re-apply under the new point based system, things may become faster.
I am hoping that under the new system, they will give some priority to people who already waited for a significant amount of time under the old system.
This is just my analysis based on the articles I read on the internet and the bill text itself.
hot of free coloring pages for
rameshvaid
04-23 12:24 PM
Go to the web site http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/index.asp and review your different options.
You can immigrate base dupon family sponsorship, employment or just the point system without employment.
I qualified by point system without employment offer. You can take the test on line for free to see if you qualify by the point system.
Best of Luck
Just go on their website down load form and send it to them. Do not need any attorney. Point sytem should be the best option for you. Filling up the forms are pretty simple.
Ramesh
You can immigrate base dupon family sponsorship, employment or just the point system without employment.
I qualified by point system without employment offer. You can take the test on line for free to see if you qualify by the point system.
Best of Luck
Just go on their website down load form and send it to them. Do not need any attorney. Point sytem should be the best option for you. Filling up the forms are pretty simple.
Ramesh
more...
house Birds Coloring pages
pappu
03-10 10:42 AM
Any body has a soft LUD on approved EAD while I 485 pending.
Soft LUD ????
It just shows how much some of us are in the dark with misinformation from forums.
Soft LUD ????
It just shows how much some of us are in the dark with misinformation from forums.
tattoo Coloring PagesSpongebob
tammman
11-11 11:07 PM
i am trying to renew my passport, do we need to fill the form online and than submit it online or we have to print, instructions are confusing..pls help out
I'm in the same boat too and I have filled it online and printed it and it will print with scan code and some more pages which u need to fill later.
This is for SFO...
I'm in the same boat too and I have filled it online and printed it and it will print with scan code and some more pages which u need to fill later.
This is for SFO...
more...
pictures coloring pages 5 | free
immilaw
09-14 08:51 AM
Here is my situation.....
My EB3 140 approved with priority date 01June2002 --> Company A
My EB2 140 pending with priority date 10May2006 -->Company A (different title...future position)
Can i port my EB3 priority date (June 2002) to EB2 application & apply I-485?.If i do, will my EB3 140 gets invalid?.I will need to file 3 year H1B extn(in Oct) based on my approved EB3 application & don't want to loose my approved 140.
Thanks in advance for your help.
The portability of I-140 priority date should be done at the time the I-140 is filed. So when your EB-2 I-140 was filed, you should have requested it at that time. There is a column on the Form I-140 which asks if an I-140 was ever approved on behalf of the beneficiary.
Why don't your file your H-1B extension now using Premium Processing? It will be approved for 3 years in 10-15 days then then you can think about porting your EB-2 priority date to EB-3.
My EB3 140 approved with priority date 01June2002 --> Company A
My EB2 140 pending with priority date 10May2006 -->Company A (different title...future position)
Can i port my EB3 priority date (June 2002) to EB2 application & apply I-485?.If i do, will my EB3 140 gets invalid?.I will need to file 3 year H1B extn(in Oct) based on my approved EB3 application & don't want to loose my approved 140.
Thanks in advance for your help.
The portability of I-140 priority date should be done at the time the I-140 is filed. So when your EB-2 I-140 was filed, you should have requested it at that time. There is a column on the Form I-140 which asks if an I-140 was ever approved on behalf of the beneficiary.
Why don't your file your H-1B extension now using Premium Processing? It will be approved for 3 years in 10-15 days then then you can think about porting your EB-2 priority date to EB-3.
dresses My family at each coloring
godspeed
02-12 01:52 PM
Looking at your profile, i am surprised u still havent received the plastic card.
If your card gets approved while you are out of the country i.e. US, and you dont have AP i had read earlier that it is considered as an abandonment. The sole purpose of AP is to provide you to get in and out of US while on AOS period.
Did u check with your company Attorney?
Hi,
Dont know if this question has been asked before, but I recently got an extension and change of employer done using AC21 to a different company. I dont have an AP and dont have the time to get one. I am travelling to India next week and am scheduling an appoitment to get an H1B stamp. Will this be an issue? Is this considered abandonment of status?
Please let me know if someone else has been in this situation.
Thanks!
If your card gets approved while you are out of the country i.e. US, and you dont have AP i had read earlier that it is considered as an abandonment. The sole purpose of AP is to provide you to get in and out of US while on AOS period.
Did u check with your company Attorney?
Hi,
Dont know if this question has been asked before, but I recently got an extension and change of employer done using AC21 to a different company. I dont have an AP and dont have the time to get one. I am travelling to India next week and am scheduling an appoitment to get an H1B stamp. Will this be an issue? Is this considered abandonment of status?
Please let me know if someone else has been in this situation.
Thanks!
more...
makeup coloring pages free totem
skd
08-21 07:46 PM
??
From USCIS Case Status Website
From USCIS Case Status Website
girlfriend free printables colouring
raysaikat
07-26 03:50 AM
Has anyone requested premium processing of I-140 based on expiry of the sixth year of H1B. My 6th year H1B expires next month and I think I am eligible for premium processing.
You are eligible only if there is *no* other way of extending your H1-B. If your labor certificate is more than 1 year old, then you are not eligible. In that case you can get 1 year extension based on the LC.
You are eligible only if there is *no* other way of extending your H1-B. If your labor certificate is more than 1 year old, then you are not eligible. In that case you can get 1 year extension based on the LC.
hairstyles free download as well as
amsgc
01-14 12:08 PM
Friend of your's needs to carefully look at that page of the passport again.
One of the following would be corssed out (or marked deleted)
(1) ECR: Emigration Check Required (for all countries except Bangladesh, Pak, North America and Europe)
(2) Emigration Check NOT Required.
If ECNR is not deleted, then there is no problem. If it is delted, there is still no problem in coming to the US (In my passport, ECNR was deleted, and I had no problem in leaving India for the US).
If ECR is not deleted, then emigration check is required only if you are travelling to countries that are not in the list of exceptions in (1).
Guys,
Friend of mine has got H1B1 visa stamped now. But we just found out that on his passport ECNR is not deleted. ECNR is still required there.
Can you guys help us to understand what this is? Do we need to remove ECNR before he travel to UR? He has BE (Mech).
When I came to US my ECNR was deleted and I am also graduate.
Your help appreciated.
Thanks,
One of the following would be corssed out (or marked deleted)
(1) ECR: Emigration Check Required (for all countries except Bangladesh, Pak, North America and Europe)
(2) Emigration Check NOT Required.
If ECNR is not deleted, then there is no problem. If it is delted, there is still no problem in coming to the US (In my passport, ECNR was deleted, and I had no problem in leaving India for the US).
If ECR is not deleted, then emigration check is required only if you are travelling to countries that are not in the list of exceptions in (1).
Guys,
Friend of mine has got H1B1 visa stamped now. But we just found out that on his passport ECNR is not deleted. ECNR is still required there.
Can you guys help us to understand what this is? Do we need to remove ECNR before he travel to UR? He has BE (Mech).
When I came to US my ECNR was deleted and I am also graduate.
Your help appreciated.
Thanks,
sabithanair84
04-23 03:05 PM
Thank you, I looked through the blog but it didnt have any posts that could answer my queries. I am just trying to find out if it is ok to travel if I have a pending case with USCIS? Also, if my H4 goes out of status on 09/23/2010, then does that mean I have immediately leave the country? Any answers would help, thanks.
Maqrkk
03-04 05:23 AM
Wow, nice!
No comments:
Post a Comment